Executive proof needs more than a count of email alerts.
Security leaders need defensible evidence for audits while analysts need a review that reflects the incidents they actually handled.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My director asked what we prevented this quarter, and I spent Friday rebuilding it from old cases.”
Grigori Kolar · Security Operations Analyst
Runs inbound email investigations for a large Microsoft 365 enterprise and prepares evidence for security leadership.
What is at stake
Security analysts are rebuilding quarterly evidence from alerts and incident notes. You have to weigh a reusable executive story against evidence customers can genuinely defend.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- scalable value evidence vs customer-specific proof
- audit readiness vs protected detection logic
- executive clarity vs analyst reporting burden
- pilot learning vs product-roadmap timing
Why Abnormal AI
Inbound Email Security sits inside enterprise Microsoft 365 environments where a removed business email and a missed threat both carry executive consequences.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 17 more at Abnormal AI, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.