Fast remediation is competing with the customer’s need to preserve legitimate vendor mail.
The SOC wants fewer manual reviews while the mail team protects a narrow window for safe changes.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I spent half my morning reopening alerts because finance asked whether a supplier invoice was missing.”
Delphine Wagner · Security Operations Analyst
She investigates vendor-fraud alerts in a large enterprise Microsoft 365 environment during the Proof of Value.
What is at stake
Thirty-one of 42 high-confidence vendor-fraud alerts were manually re-reviewed in five days. You must weigh faster remediation against the risk of hiding legitimate supplier mail.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- faster remediation vs legitimate vendor mail
- SOC capacity vs mail-flow conservatism
- POV proof vs limited change window
Why Abnormal AI
The Abnormal AI platform must demonstrate measurable remediation value alongside an existing Proofpoint environment.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 17 more at Abnormal AI, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.