The compute mount must absorb landing shock without trapping heat or consuming flight-time margin.
A heavier, stiffer assembly protects connectors, while added mass and restricted airflow reduce aircraft endurance.
Who you’d be doing this for
“After the last landing, my crew had to pull the aircraft aside and inspect every connector.”
Mikkel Olsson · UAS Operations Manager
Responsible for keeping autonomous aircraft available for coordinated missions across a heterogeneous fleet.
What is at stake
The compute enclosure shifts after hard landings and begins loading its connector shells. You must weigh landing survivability against cooling, weight, and the next flight-test window.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- landing survivability vs aircraft endurance
- mount stiffness vs harness protection
- next-sortie speed vs repeatable validation
- field service access vs enclosure retention
Why Applied Intuition
Drone autonomy depends on edge compute hardware staying secure and available through real aircraft landings.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 70 more at Applied Intuition, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.