HIL time is scarce, but interface readiness is assembled from disconnected evidence.
Program managers need an early readiness call, while test engineers need evidence that survives technical review.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I need to know what is actually ready before I burn another HIL slot.”
Arnaud Stewart · Autonomy Program Manager
Coordinates vehicle vendors, test engineers, and autonomy teams before integration milestones.
What is at stake
HIL reservations are being made from separate SIL results, hardware notes, and vendor inputs. You must weigh an early common signal against the evidence needed for engineers to trust it.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- early HIL decisions vs. inspectable technical evidence
- shared readiness criteria vs. vehicle-specific constraints
- program visibility vs. backend durability
- fast pilot scope vs. reusable integration infrastructure
Why Applied Intuition
Axion integration work spans embedded Linux hardware, autonomy software, SIL, HIL, and third-party UAS platforms.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 65 more at Applied Intuition, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.