AI Teammate actions are visible in projects while their usage is hard to explain.
Administrators need enough detail to govern consumption, while the platform must protect execution internals.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Finance asked why last week’s agent use jumped, and I had to piece it together from project activity.”
Volkan Jafari · Enterprise Project Manager
Oversees shared delivery projects where AI Teammates act alongside people and must answer budget questions from finance.
What is at stake
Administrators cannot connect an AI Teammate usage event to the project action that produced it. You must weigh usable accountability against exposing execution details.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- administrator accountability vs execution confidentiality
- reusable platform APIs vs a clear investigation flow
- fast first release vs durable Work Graph linkage
- usage adoption vs cost scrutiny
Why Asana
AI Teammates and the Work Graph place agent actions inside enterprise workflows where administrators must account for how work was carried out.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 28 more at Asana, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.