Equipment choices are becoming commercial commitments before procurement confirms them.
Installers need designs that survive component changes, while equipment partners need controlled claims about what their products support.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I had to redraw three storage jobs this week after the sales team told homeowners the equipment was locked in.”
Kelechi Darko · Solar Project Designer
Works for a regional installer whose sales team commits designs before procurement confirms component availability.
What is at stake
Late component swaps are forcing installers to redraw solar-plus-storage projects after homeowners approve proposals. You must weigh partner reach against claims that installers can trust in a live design conversation.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- partner reach vs. credible product claims
- shared pipeline vs. forecast discipline
- installer speed vs. design certainty
- repeatability vs. tailored demonstrations
Why Aurora Solar
PV and battery design workflows sit between the proposal that wins a project and the electrical configuration that must reach installation without material redesign.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 3 more at Aurora Solar, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.