The EPC must choose between a lower subscription price and fewer late electrical changes.
Procurement protects immediate spend while engineering protects designs from reaching materials ordering unfinished.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My designers are tired of finding the real electrical questions after materials are already being discussed.”
Yaw Asante · Engineering Director
Leads the design standards team at the EPC evaluating whether the workflow can support solar-plus-storage delivery.
What is at stake
A €450,000 ARR opportunity is stalled because procurement backs the cheaper bid and engineering rejects its delivery risk. You have to weigh price protection against a value case that both groups can verify.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- subscription cost vs. delivery rework
- commercial speed vs. technical proof
- forecast attainment vs. deal quality
- procurement leverage vs. engineering confidence
Why Aurora Solar
PV and battery designs sit between the proposal and the component choices that determine whether an EPC can deliver without redesign.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 3 more at Aurora Solar, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.