The battery savings case has to persuade finance without promising more than the bill data supports.
The installer needs faster proposal confidence while its finance lead needs a savings model that can withstand scrutiny.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My reps are asking why the battery number moved, and I need an answer before I sign anything.”
Philippa Dekker · Finance Director
She approves software spend for a UK installer whose sales team needs credible solar-plus-storage proposals.
What is at stake
A €90,000 opportunity is stalled because the buyer cannot reconcile two battery savings estimates. You have to weigh a fast, persuasive proposal against assumptions the finance lead can defend.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- battery savings confidence vs. claim defensibility
- fast close vs. verified assumptions
- technical depth vs. sales simplicity
- quarterly ARR vs. durable adoption
Why Aurora Solar
Battery storage design and utility-bill modeling sit at the center of how solar installers defend residential proposals when savings are under pressure.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 3 more at Aurora Solar, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.