The upgrade preserves export stability while removing structure that accessible PDFs depend on.
Enterprise accessibility obligations pull against retaining Chromium fixes that stabilize the wider export path.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Our report looked fine until the reviewer tabbed through it and the footnotes vanished.”
Izumi Wang · Accessibility Program Manager
Owns review of customer-facing documents produced by an Enterprise content team.
What is at stake
Some Enterprise PDFs look complete but lose chart and footnote structure for screen readers. You must weigh accessibility assurance against preserving export fixes that other download workflows need.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- accessible document integrity vs export continuity
- Chromium upgrade stability vs post-processing safety
- automated checks vs human accessibility review
- Enterprise availability vs defensible compliance boundaries
Why Canva
Canva's Chromium-based export pipeline turns designs into downloadable files for Enterprise customers and also powers print production, thumbnails, and AI model training.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 35 more at Canva, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.