A more complete reasoning path is merging facts that must remain separate.
The cutover protects inference cost and completeness on one side, source-faithful treatment narratives on the other.
Who you’d be doing this for
“The narrative put two providers into one course of treatment, and now I’m reopening the whole section.”
Kavita Das · Personal-Injury Attorney
Reviews structured treatment narratives before incorporating them into demand preparation.
What is at stake
Three of 240 reviewed cases merge facts from separate providers despite an 11-point completeness gain. You have to weigh a one-way routing decision against the cost of keeping two expensive paths alive.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- completeness gains vs. provider separation
- one-way cutover vs. parallel-path cost
- benchmark confidence vs. expert verification
- release timing vs. attorney trust
Why EvenUp
Piai turns long legal and medical records into claims intelligence that personal-injury attorneys must be able to review and rely on.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 15 more at EvenUp, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.