The migration preserves case history only if source identity survives the stream.
Customer migration timing protects continuity, while reviewer-verified links protect legal confidence in each chronology.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I opened a citation for my client’s surgery and landed in someone else’s file, so now I’m checking every link by hand.”
Kostas Nikolaou · Personal-Injury Attorney
Reviews generated medical chronologies before using them in demand preparation for an active plaintiff matter.
What is at stake
Cross-matter citations are appearing in generated chronologies while the treatment totals still look correct. You must weigh a committed migration date against the evidence needed to trust every corrected mapping.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- migration continuity vs source-level accuracy
- automated anomaly detection vs reviewer proof
- rapid cutover vs reversible validation
- correct treatment totals vs correct supporting evidence
Why EvenUp
Source-linked case intelligence is the basis on which personal-injury attorneys can verify generated chronologies and demands.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 15 more at EvenUp, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.