Generated variation volume is growing faster than a designer can judge which option belongs in the file.
A narrow ranking surface protects creative choice, while manual comparison is consuming the time saved by generation.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I spent most of my morning clicking through options just to keep three.”
Kamala Mehta · Senior UI/UX Designer
Generates and compares visual variations while preparing assets for product reviews.
What is at stake
Designers spend a median 8.5 minutes narrowing 12 generated variations before reuse. You must weigh click-derived signals against a ranking model that still respects visual intent.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- creative intent vs. click signals
- ranking usefulness vs. transparent control
- new model value vs. narrow first surface
- pilot learning vs. integration scope
Why Figma
Figma Weave puts AI-generated variations beside the Figma file where UI/UX designers decide what is reusable in their product work.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 45 more at Figma, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.