File context is improving relevance while pushing connected asset generation past its latency budget.
The prompt needs enough design context to produce usable assets, while the inference path needs a bounded request size.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I’ve rerun the same asset four times, and my review starts in an hour.”
Eshe Twahirwa · UI/UX Designer
Uses Figma files as the source context for repeated visual-asset generation.
What is at stake
Successful connected asset generations fell to 82% after the prompt-template update. You must weigh a fast context cap against preserving enough file detail for useful output.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- file context vs. latency budget
- fast mitigation vs. output relevance
- shared release slot vs. broader diagnosis
Why Figma
Figma MCP connects design-file context to AI workflows where interrupted generations break the creative flow inside Figma.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 45 more at Figma, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.