Complex day at Figma

Secure $900,000 in purchases without ceding nine direct accounts

Published Nov 7, 2026

You’re the sales / partnerships lead. Your team is in the room.

The setting

builds AI-powered tools for product teams. applies AI models to creative design tasks for professional creatives and designers.

A guaranteed purchase commitment now depends on control of customers already buying directly.

Finance wants the contracted minimum, and enterprise leadership wants to retain the disputed customer relationships.

Who you’d be doing this for

“Procurement called me this morning asking why a partner now owns our conversation. Nobody on my team agreed to that.”

Kirill Nemec · Enterprise Design Director · a character in this brief

Sponsors one of the nine disputed direct opportunities and expects an existing procurement conversation to continue.

What is at stake

A partner ties $900,000 in Weave purchases to exclusivity over customers already negotiating directly. You must weigh a binding minimum against customer access that an 18-month agreement would surrender.

Why it isn’t already fixed

Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.

  • guaranteed purchases vs direct customer access
  • partner scale vs bounded service commitments
  • signature deadline vs verified buying authority
  • exclusive rights vs flexibility for existing customers

Why Figma

Weave distribution reaches design buyers whose existing Figma relationships already support direct opportunities.

Written with these in mind

Strategic partnerships leadsEnterprise deal negotiatorsDistribution business development leaders

Not your kind of problem? 59 more at Figma, or browse every organization.

Where the organization context comes fromThe postings this brief was written from, and the reporting read before it.

The organization context comes from public information. The situation and characters are written for the brief.

Job postings it was written from

Public descriptions of the work at Figma. They are listed as sources, not as openings. The lines under a posting are its own words, where it meets this brief.

This is the setup. The work is inside.

Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.

Other live briefs connected to this one, and what connects them.

Similar problems at other organizations

Like this one, each of these is about betting growth on an outside partner or launch.

The same setting, from another role

Each is set around Figma’s Figma Weave, written for a different role. They’re separate briefs, not the same scenario.

Other problems with a similar purpose

In each of these, as in this one, the aim is to structure a partnership that creates real growth today and still holds up under pressure years later.