Something new at Figma

Win agency buy-in while four refuse to buy software for clients

Published Nov 7, 2026

You’re the sales / partnerships lead. Your team is in the room.

The setting

builds AI-powered tools for product teams. applies AI models to creative design tasks for professional creatives and designers.

Agencies bring customer trust, but disagree about who should hold the software contract.

Direct customer ownership protects continuity after an agency engagement, while bundled purchasing protects the agency’s commercial relationship.

Who you’d be doing this for

“Our agency showed us the assets on Tuesday. Procurement asked who we'd pay, and nobody in the room gave the same answer.”

Sari Prasert · Head of Product Design · a character in this brief

Leads one of the eight prospective customer teams whose agency has offered to introduce generated asset workflows.

What is at stake

Six agencies disagree on how to sell creative software to their clients. You have to make participation commercially worthwhile without tying customer access to an agency services contract.

Why it isn’t already fixed

Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.

  • agency incentives vs collected revenue economics
  • bundled purchasing vs direct customer continuity
  • partner reach vs another commercial intermediary
  • repeatable terms vs market-specific buying preferences

Why Figma

Agencies already working in Figma offer a route into Weave purchases, but their service relationships do not establish a software buying relationship.

Written with these in mind

Strategic distribution buildersEnterprise dealmakers moving into partnershipsCommercial leads who enjoy designing mutual value

Not your kind of problem? 59 more at Figma, or browse every organization.

Where the organization context comes fromThe postings this brief was written from, and the reporting read before it.

The organization context comes from public information. The situation and characters are written for the brief.

Job postings it was written from

Public descriptions of the work at Figma. They are listed as sources, not as openings. The lines under a posting are its own words, where it meets this brief.

This is the setup. The work is inside.

Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.

Other live briefs connected to this one, and what connects them.

Similar problems at other organizations

Like this one, each of these is about betting growth on an outside partner or launch.

The same setting, from another role

Each is set around Figma’s Figma Weave, written for a different role. They’re separate briefs, not the same scenario.

Other problems with a similar purpose

In each of these, as in this one, the aim is to build alliances that produce real, repeatable value for every side, not just polite introductions.