Infrastructure transitions become consequential when continuity and evidence must move together.
A technically successful rehearsal can still leave unanswered questions about what can be trusted at cutover.
Who you’d be doing this for
“If access breaks during signing week, nobody cares that the migration looked good in rehearsal.”
Mihai Morozov · Deputy General Counsel
Relies on restricted matter access and uninterrupted drafting workflows during an active transaction.
What is at stake
Rehearsals hit 99.97% retrieval success, but 0.6% of credentials still have lineage gaps that only application owners can clear. You have to decide what evidence is enough before cutover, when rollback gets expensive.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- cutover deadline vs. evidence completeness
- aggregate success vs. exception proof
- workflow continuity vs. security hardening
- vendor bridge vs. durable internal control
Why Harvey
For Harvey, secure continuity often underpins the legal workflows where customers expect controlled access and dependable availability.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 17 more at Harvey, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.