A diligence review cannot start confidently when a folder's gaps look like a legal conclusion.
Associates need enough context to begin review, while lawyers must retain judgment about what a matter requires.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I spent half an hour chasing files that were there, just not available to me.”
Tara Chauhan · M&A Associate
Prepares diligence reviews from large matter folders supplied by clients and deal teams.
What is at stake
Associates are delaying diligence because folder gaps and access limits look the same. You must weigh a faster starting point against language that could overstate what the matter needs.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- faster review starts vs attorney judgment
- folder clarity vs permission boundaries
- useful guidance vs unsupported certainty
- shared patterns vs connector variation
Why Harvey
Vault is where enterprise matter files become usable context for citation-grounded legal work.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 43 more at Harvey, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.