Expanded-context drafting needs customer evidence before it becomes a broad release.
Early access must move quickly enough to learn from live legal work while preserving a review bar lawyers can defend.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My associates are asking when they can try it, and I need to know what we’ve actually tested first.”
Despina Georgiou · Associate General Counsel
Leads a corporate legal team evaluating whether lawyers can use a new drafting workflow on active commercial matters.
What is at stake
Twelve legal teams need a reviewed path into expanded-context drafting within 10 weeks. You must weigh fast customer learning against a readiness bar lawyers can defend.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- fast customer learning vs defensible legal review
- release momentum vs comparable evidence
- firm-specific feedback vs reusable launch signals
- model capability vs attorney accountability
Why Harvey
Citation-grounded drafting depends on lawyers being able to inspect and stand behind the authorities behind each generated conclusion.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 43 more at Harvey, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.