Law firms want to offer AI-backed legal work while corporate clients demand proof behind every citation.
The partner programme must protect outside counsel's service model while giving corporate legal buyers evidence that AI costs change the work.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My CFO asked what changed in the work product, and I only had a bigger invoice.”
Diana Svoboda · Deputy General Counsel
A corporate legal buyer reviewing whether outside counsel's AI-enabled work justifies new technology or fee commitments.
What is at stake
Corporate legal buyers are challenging outside counsel to show what AI changed before approving another spend line. You must weigh a scalable partner motion against promises that lawyers can actually document.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- law-firm service differentiation vs corporate budget scrutiny
- scalable programme terms vs practice-specific needs
- citation evidence vs unsupported accuracy promises
- direct pipeline speed vs partner-sourced reach
Why Harvey
Assistant, Vault, and Word workflows place citation-grounded research and drafting inside the legal work that law firms deliver to corporate clients.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 43 more at Harvey, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.