The next deal needs faster issue summaries without turning attorney review into a formality.
A narrow pilot protects the immediate transaction, while a reusable pattern protects the value of the next one.
Who you’d be doing this for
“The committee wants the issues today, and I’m still chasing where each one came from.”
Peng Ma · Senior Corporate Counsel
Reviews acquisition diligence findings before advising internal deal sponsors.
What is at stake
Corporate lawyers are rebuilding issue lists from diligence folders and Excel trackers before transaction reviews. You must weigh a focused pilot against a pattern the legal team can reuse.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- deal speed vs. attorney source review
- narrow pilot scope vs. reusable implementation
- transaction confidentiality vs. usable evidence
- Excel continuity vs. workflow change
Why Harvey
Harvey Deals and Excel already sit beside the investment materials that corporate legal teams must turn into reviewable diligence findings.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 43 more at Harvey, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.