The remaining enrollment window must prove value without turning treatment access into a cost-control test.
Finance needs a credible utilization case, while Clinical needs members already in treatment protected from disruption.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Finance asked me why spend is climbing when so many people still haven’t enrolled.”
Sophie Roux · Benefits Manager
Owns the employer’s family-health benefits portfolio and must defend the program to finance during benefits planning.
What is at stake
Enrollment must reach 16% in eight weeks while members already in treatment keep access. You must weigh the fastest enrollment lift against a financial case that can withstand scrutiny.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- enrollment growth vs. treatment continuity
- financial proof vs. delayed claims evidence
- one final employer change vs. multiple funnel needs
- benefits-manager clarity vs. clinical nuance
Why Maven Clinic
Fertility & Family Building combines enrollment, care navigation, and benefit administration, so a benefit decision reaches both employer economics and active care.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 14 more at Maven Clinic, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.