Some customer categories require a durable line between acceptable activity and unacceptable exposure.
The hardest decisions often pair strong evidence with consequences that remain after the policy is published.
Who you’d be doing this for
“We’re not asking for special treatment—we need someone to understand what our business actually does.”
Ama Balogun · Chief Financial Officer
Leads finance for a software company that provides compliance tooling to digital-asset businesses but does not custody assets.
What is at stake
The partner bank set a deadline to replace informal case guidance with a written eligibility and monitoring standard. You have to say which activities remain eligible, knowing a restricted label is costly to undo.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- examination remediation vs. customer continuity
- sector taxonomy vs. actual activity
- conservative restriction vs. proportionate controls
- automated classification vs. verified evidence
- deadline certainty vs. durable policy quality
Why Mercury
At Mercury, this can matter where technology businesses operate near rapidly changing financial-risk boundaries.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 9 more at Mercury, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.