The approval path that protects finance is delaying the trips leaders need to take.
Travel leaders need faster booking decisions, while finance needs a record that explains every authorization.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My executives are asking why a held fare disappeared, and finance wants the approval trail for the same trip.”
Marta Colombo · Corporate Travel Manager
Owns policy administration and traveler adoption for the enterprise travel program.
What is at stake
Senior travelers are losing fare holds while finance cannot trace several approved trips. You must weigh booking speed against an authorization record the customer can defend.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- fare-hold protection vs. approval traceability
- renewal urgency vs. irreversible configuration change
- traveler adoption vs. finance controls
- service exceptions vs. scalable program design
Why Navan
Navan and Navan Expense sit across the booking, approval, and expense record the customer is using to make the renewal decision.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 54 more at Navan, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.