Corporate cards promise point-of-spend control, while finance needs proof that reconciliation will become simpler.
The programme has to accelerate card adoption without assuming every customer has the same accounting process or policy maturity.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My controller asked why we need another card programme if close still means chasing the same details.”
Sara Salehi · Expense Administrator
Runs expense controls and month-end preparation for a mid-market customer moving beyond a travel-only programme.
What is at stake
Travel-only customers are weighing separate card and expense bundles while reconciliation work remains fragmented. You must weigh a repeatable adoption path against the accounting differences that make a standard playbook risky.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- card adoption speed vs accounting-process fit
- repeatable programme vs account-specific value
- point-of-spend control vs finance-ready reporting
- expansion momentum vs implementation capacity
Why Navan
Navan Expense connects corporate cards, smart policy management, and expense reporting for customers seeking one view of T&E spend.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 54 more at Navan, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.