The event-air handoff is caught between platform scale and specialist certainty.
One path protects capacity and consistency, while a second review protects high-value group travel from missing context.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My event lead asked why the same request is open twice, and I had no clean answer.”
Budi Nguyen · Corporate Travel Manager
Runs an enterprise event program and depends on a single accurate status for group-air arrangements.
What is at stake
Eligible group-air requests are being worked twice, inflating consultant load and confusing event planners. You must weigh a cleaner platform handoff against the specialist checks complex itineraries still need.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- platform adoption vs specialist service certainty
- consultant capacity vs exception coverage
- clean forecasting vs local operational judgment
- fast operating rule vs durable product change
Why Navan
Navan Event Travel Platform adoption depends on moving routine group-air work online without losing the specialist service complex programs require.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 54 more at Navan, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.