Off-channel visibility can open an enterprise conversation without proving managed behavior will follow.
Finance wants a fuller spend picture while travel leaders need a path that keeps policy ownership credible.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My CFO asked about flights in the expense file that never touched our travel program, and I had no clean answer.”
Isabella Costa · Corporate Travel Manager
Runs a managed enterprise travel program and is accountable for policy adoption and program visibility.
What is at stake
Finance and travel leaders cannot agree what off-channel spend means for program value. You must shape a sellable first motion without promising coverage the platform cannot yet prove.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- finance visibility vs travel program ownership
- net-new differentiation vs launch credibility
- broad market interest vs qualified demand
- early commitment vs reversible learning
Why Navan
The travel-and-expense platform sits at the point where booking behavior, policy governance, and finance visibility meet.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 54 more at Navan, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.