The employer wants accountable outcomes, but the contract cannot promise a measure it cannot reconcile.
The benefits committee needs proof it can verify while Finance needs exposure it can price.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My CFO asked which number we would use when our claims file and your report disagree.”
Agnieszka Kolar · Population Health Manager
She leads benefits performance reporting for a self-insured employer considering chronic-condition support for its covered population.
What is at stake
A 45,000-life employer deal is stalled over an outcomes measure the committee can independently verify. You must weigh a stronger guarantee against terms Finance can support and Legal can defend.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- auditable outcomes vs. attractive guarantees
- contract lives vs. margin protection
- broker confidence vs. bespoke terms
- claims evidence vs. platform reporting
Why Omada Health
Omada Platform sells into employer benefits decisions where enrollment, engagement, and measurable cardiometabolic results must hold up beyond the sales cycle.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 7 more at Omada Health, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.