The consent screen must preserve member understanding without breaking the continuity clinicians expect.
Broader data access supports care coordination, while explicit member control limits unexpected sharing.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My appointment is tomorrow, and I still don’t know if they can see every night I’ve ever had.”
Siti Aung · Member preparing for a cardiology visit
He connected his app to a healthcare partner so his clinician could review relevant health context.
What is at stake
Nine of 16 release-test members described incompatible sharing scopes. You have to weigh clinician continuity against consent that members can genuinely explain.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- care continuity vs member control
- release date vs verified understanding
- clinical context vs plain-language consent
- automation speed vs research traceability
Why Ōura
The app connects members to healthcare partners through HIPAA consent flows and EHR integrations.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 30 more at Ōura, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.