Project44
Each of these is a real decision Project44 is working through, written so you can make the call yourself — incomplete information, someone who pushes back, no answer key.
Project44 is an enterprise SaaS provider of an AI-driven supply chain decision intelligence and visibility platform, serving large multimodal shippers and logistics service providers with transportation management, real-time shipment/inventory visibility, and yard management capabilities across global freight networks. Its visibility products include Ground (FTL, LTL, Parcel, Rail), Ocean, Air, and Orders. It turns billions of carrier signals into real-time tracking, milestones, and notifications. A dedicated, AI-native division called p44LSP.ai is built to serve the LSP market. Project44 builds AI agent workflows that automate carrier monitoring, performance tracking, exception management, and escalation processes. Its Product & Design organization spans eight pillars, including Visibility, Intelligent TMS, and an AI Agent/Autopilot portfolio. Project44 builds its systems in a multi-cloud environment using AWS and GCP.
Your first one is free. No card.
23 live right now.
The rest
Prove what agents saved in 90 days without changing live workflows
Operations leaders are rebuilding evidence of agent value before renewal conversations. You must weigh a reusable programme against each customer’s different margin and policy definitions.
Decide when write-back returns to production ahead of peak tendering
Accepted tenders are landing in the wrong custom fields for high-value loads. You must weigh a faster return to production against proof that regional mappings will hold.
Restore milestones for carrier responses before the first value review
Carrier responses are not reliably appearing in the customer’s TMS view, forcing manual follow-up on live loads. You have to weigh a fast, reversible configuration change against the evidence needed to preserve trust in the workflow.
Rank accounts by renewal risk while Salesforce looks healthy
Unresolved shipment-data issues are surfacing in customer calls even when account activity looks healthy. You must weigh earlier risk preparation against the need for every rank to be evidence-backed.
Turn ETA patterns into carrier action before renewal reviews
Transportation managers are rebuilding carrier scorecards outside the platform when leaders ask why arrivals slip. You must weigh a reusable value programme against claims the underlying carrier data cannot support.
Hold tenders until carrier capacity and live loads agree
Cross-border dispatchers are holding tenders when batch carrier capacity conflicts with live TMS changes. You must weigh faster tendering against sending work to a carrier whose availability has gone stale.
Protect late acceptances while rebids enter the TMS
Late acknowledgements are leaving some loads with two plausible carrier states. You must weigh pickup-window protection against preserving a carrier’s valid acceptance.
Stop duplicate tenders before dispatchers lose the release window
Duplicate webhook deliveries are creating two TMS tender actions for the same load. You have to preserve legitimate retries while making each tender land only once.
Surface silent loads before consignees start chasing updates
Loads with missing milestones are being discovered through customer calls instead of the operating workflow. You must weigh earlier intervention against the false exceptions that could bury real risk.
Commit to reefer alarms before the TMS cutover locks in
Validated reefer alarms are failing to become timely, reliable TMS exceptions. You must weigh faster intervention against the cost of a wrong automated escalation.
Stop duplicate cases in the TMS without muting real late loads
Duplicate TMS cases must fall below 1% of late-shipment events within ten business days. You must weigh fast exception escalation against the confidence operators need in every case.
Find causes of carrier delays while the integration looks healthy
Carrier updates can stop reaching visibility services while the connection still appears healthy. You must decide which evidence AI can assemble and where engineers must confirm the cause.
Trace tender choices before managers approve TMS write-back
Operations managers cannot readily explain why an automated tender selected a carrier. You must weigh a useful decision record against secure, reliable event correlation across customer workflows.
Trace ETA failures before on-call investigations consume the shift
ETA investigations are consuming on-call time while transportation managers wait for an explanation. You must weigh faster evidence assembly against the risk of treating an AI-ranked cause as confirmed.
Link diverted cargo when the journey changes its reference
Diverted barge loads can split into separate records just when operations needs a dependable ETA. You must weigh continuity for disrupted cargo against the risk of joining the wrong shipment.
Set a go-live date you can defend
The retention deadline is six weeks from now, and the records you sampled show mixed classification and open exceptions on access. Detail vanishes from live views for good, so decide what to verify before calling go-live.
Set the rules for appointment-risk alerts
Recommendations sometimes clash with fixed carrier appointments and warehouse receiving limits, and acting on a bad one is expensive. You have to set the launch scope before this spreads to more customers.
Decide what to claim about corridor ETAs
Corridor proof lifts evaluation intent by 28%, but reviews found event coverage and arrival accuracy vary too much for a broad regional claim. You set the evidence bar before media and field programs lock in.
Decide whether to sign an exclusive deal
A logistics provider wants regional exclusivity for three years with booking minimums, and names its partner in 18 days. You have to weigh the revenue against the partnerships it blocks, and verify the coverage forecasts.
Commit to a supplier rollout you can verify
Fewer than half of strategic suppliers can send the shipment references needed to match inbound loads. You have to keep the rollout verifiable without promising supplier participation you cannot guarantee.
Set the rules for cancelling on a missed deadline
Replay shows 0.3% of past tender sequences would have cancelled a load even though the carrier accepted late. Once the TMS releases that load you cannot take it back, so you weigh safeguards against lost capacity.
Switch the carrier feed to webhooks before cutover
The carrier retires its polling feed in 45 days, and the webhook replacement uses different auth and different event meanings. You have to prove shipment states and ETA inputs stay correct before you can test at full volume.