The exercise needs a single tracking package while the evidence disagrees about where targets are being lost.
Mission continuity protects remote operators, while unverified model behavior could carry target-loss risk into a committed deployment.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My operators are replaying clips to explain where the vehicle went, and the exercise is next week.”
Clement Henderson · Critical Infrastructure Operations Manager
Oversees remote patrol operations and must account for what aircraft observed during concurrent missions.
What is at stake
Tracked vehicles disappear during video dips in concurrent missions, even when aircraft stay on route. You must weigh mission continuity against a release decision that cannot be cheaply undone.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- target continuity vs embedded power margin
- recorded-video accuracy vs field reliability
- exercise deadline vs verified release evidence
- cloud-side mitigation vs onboard autonomy
Why Skydio
Autonomy on docked aircraft must sustain multi-drone operations when remote operators cannot manually recover every lost track.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 61 more at Skydio, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.