The shared workflow shows findings after review while developers need them inside the pull request.
Release continuity protects the delivery schedule, while visible Snyk results protect the point where developers choose to merge.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I found the same vulnerable package after it merged, and now every team wants to know why the check vanished.”
Nirere Ngugi · Application Security Engineer
Owns policy visibility and remediation governance for the customer’s engineering organization.
What is at stake
Dependency findings are visible in the web view but absent from pull requests on a shared service. You must restore developer feedback without disrupting the release workflow.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- release continuity vs. pull-request visibility
- shared workflow stability vs. fast recovery
- security policy clarity vs. developer interruption
- web visibility vs. in-flow remediation
Why Snyk
Snyk scanning only becomes developer-first security when its results reach the GitHub pull-request workflow where code is reviewed.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 9 more at Snyk, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.