AI-assisted code needs developer feedback without widening the customer’s approved data boundary.
The pilot must make security visible in merge requests while preserving the controls that let a regulated customer adopt it.
Who you’d be doing this for
“My developers keep asking for a green light, and I still can’t show them the approved path.”
Martin Nikolic · Application Security Engineer
Owns application-security policy and must approve how AI-assisted code enters delivery workflows.
What is at stake
Three pilot repositories need scan results in merge requests within 10 weeks. You have to weigh developer feedback against the customer’s approved data boundary.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- developer feedback vs approved data boundaries
- reusable pattern vs customer-specific controls
- merge-request visibility vs pipeline stability
- pilot speed vs durable hand-off
Why Snyk
Snyk connects application security to the GitLab workflows where regulated customers are bringing AI-assisted code into delivery.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 9 more at Snyk, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.