The contract must promise accountable value without turning employee practice into a financial liability.
HR needs a workforce-wide program now, while procurement needs protection from paying for outcomes it cannot verify.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Finance asked me what changes after people practice, and I don’t have a clean answer yet.”
Mikel Dimitriou · Learning and Development Administrator
Runs the enterprise language-learning program and must defend its value to HR and finance.
What is at stake
An 8,000-employee agreement could slip as procurement seeks remedies tied to learner outcomes. You have to weigh a quarter-end close against commitments the program can genuinely support.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- workforce scale vs contractual exposure
- progress evidence vs outcome guarantees
- quarter-end ARR vs durable renewal terms
- procurement protection vs sponsor urgency
Why Speak
Speak for Business sells workplace speaking practice into enterprises that now scrutinize both learner engagement and measurable program value.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 36 more at Speak, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.