The chain exit demands continuity while the wallet boundary must remain provable.
The customer needs uninterrupted payment flows, and compliance needs evidence that signing and recovery did not change.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I need to tell the queue what happens on cutover night, not guess which wallets will come back.”
Basma Bahrami · Payments Operations Lead
Owns the customer’s daily payment exception queue for an application whose users transact through embedded wallets.
What is at stake
Eligible wallets must retain a verified signing path through a fixed chain shutdown. You must weigh payment continuity against proof that authorization and recovery boundaries stay intact.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- payment continuity vs authorization proof
- fixed shutdown date vs complete failure-case evidence
- customer-specific speed vs reusable product learning
- product compatibility path vs customer-operated migration
Why Stripe
Privy sits above wallets across chains, so a customer migration tests whether its signing layer remains dependable when network choices change.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 88 more at Stripe, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.