A signing response and a completed XRP Ledger payment are different promises to the user.
The customer needs fast payment feedback while Privy must preserve the boundary between signing and transaction tracking.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Our app knows the wallet signed, then everyone asks me if the payment actually left.”
Yamini Khanna · Blockchain Application Developer
Owns the embedded-wallet transaction flow at the regulated payments builder running the pilot.
What is at stake
Signed XRP Ledger payments can leave users staring at a status the customer cannot confidently explain. You have to weigh a fast, reusable integration against clear ownership of each transaction state.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- fast payment feedback vs. accurate transaction claims
- customer flexibility vs. reusable integration patterns
- signed state vs. confirmed state
- pilot urgency vs. supportable operations
Why Stripe
Privy’s XRP Ledger support leaves transaction construction, broadcast, and tracking with the application while Privy signs under developer policies.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 88 more at Stripe, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.