Historical evidence becomes harder to move when integrity and lifecycle obligations travel with it.
Teams must preserve what auditors need while honoring the conditions under which some records must no longer exist.
Who you’d be doing this for
“I need to prove we kept the right evidence—and didn’t keep what we were meant to delete.”
Sithu Intharasak · Privacy and Compliance Director
Oversees evidence retention, audit response, and data-lifecycle obligations for a regulated technology company.
What is at stake
The current store cannot meet the coming immutability rules, and its contract ends in 120 days. You have to weigh a migration that keeps retention periods, deletion duties, hashes and exports intact across millions of records.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- immutability vs. deletion obligations
- cutover deadline vs. verification depth
- managed-vendor safety vs. product control
- historical continuity vs. lifecycle correction
Why Vanta
At Vanta, it tends to matter because evidence remains valuable only when its history and handling can be defended over time.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 7 more at Vanta, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.