The bank must choose between centralized investigation and a branch network boundary it will not weaken.
Security needs all 640 cameras reachable for investigation while the CISO needs camera traffic isolated from shared branch systems.
Who you’d be doing this for
“Fraud reviews are already chasing footage across old systems, and now the install date is moving.”
Agustin Garcia · Director of Physical Security
Owns investigations and branch coverage for the bank’s 18-site replacement program.
What is at stake
Five branches have conflicting LTE, bandwidth, and firewall evidence, while 640 cameras await a purchase order. You must weigh centralized investigation against a network boundary the CISO will not relax.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- centralized investigation vs strict branch isolation
- purchase-order speed vs site-level verification
- uniform controls vs constrained-site coverage
- automated assessment vs verified field evidence
Why Verkada
Cloud-managed cameras require a customer network design that preserves Command access without violating the security controls of distributed enterprise sites.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 63 more at Verkada, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.