Access changes can look complete in an interface while older delivery paths still retain their own rules.
Teams need immediate revocation without interrupting legitimate collaboration on active hiring work.
Who you’d be doing this for
“When access is removed, I need that to mean removed everywhere—not mostly removed.”
Matti Haugen · Talent Compliance Manager
Oversees recruiting data controls for a company operating under strict privacy and customer assurance requirements.
What is at stake
Old download links still open attachments after an admin narrows a recruiter's access, and cached links expire on a different path than integration ones. You have to close this off without breaking live hiring work.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- immediate revocation vs. uninterrupted collaboration
- centralized control vs. integration continuity
- fast containment vs. durable architecture
- automated analysis vs. independently verified evidence
Why Ashby
For Ashby, candidate-document access often carries both workflow value and a high trust burden.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 4 more at Ashby, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.