Harvey
DevOps EngineerComplexAug 6, 2026

Complete secrets migration with verified credential lineage

Infrastructure transitions become consequential when continuity and evidence must move together.

A technically successful rehearsal can still leave unanswered questions about what can be trusted at cutover.

If access breaks during signing week, nobody cares that the migration looked good in rehearsal.

Mihai Morozov · Deputy General Counsel

Relies on restricted matter access and uninterrupted drafting workflows during an active transaction.

What pulls against what

  • cutover deadline vs. evidence completeness
  • aggregate success vs. exception proof
  • workflow continuity vs. security hardening
  • vendor bridge vs. durable internal control

What is at stake

The legacy backend is nearing end of support, but migration evidence has unresolved gaps. Cutover must preserve continuity and prove every credential’s lineage

Why Harvey

For Harvey, secure continuity often underpins the legal workflows where customers expect controlled access and dependable availability.

Written for

Security-focused DevOps engineerMigration reliability specialistInfrastructure verification practitioner

This is the setup. The work is inside.

Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.