Secure vendor-consolidation cutover without disrupting legal work
A committed consolidation can turn routine vendor controls into a continuity decision.
Savings depend on moving decisively, while legal-work reliability depends on evidence that is expensive to establish.
“I can absorb change, but I can’t absorb a gap in the middle of a live matter.”
Unai Navarro · Deputy General Counsel
Leads an in-house legal team that needs uninterrupted, current authorities and document-analysis capacity during active matters.
What pulls against what
- committed savings vs. continuity assurance
- automated mapping speed vs. human-verifiable evidence
- fixed contract dates vs. unresolved dependencies
- single-provider simplicity vs. long-term dependency
What is at stake
The savings date is fixed, but critical transition evidence remains unverified. A weak cutover could create hard-to-reverse gaps in legal work continuity
Why Harvey
At Harvey, it can matter where supplier transitions touch the availability and trustworthiness of legal work infrastructure.
Written for
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.