Retention decisions can protect compliance while changing what operators can see in the moment.
The same historical record may carry different value for auditors, planners, and frontline operations.
Who you’d be doing this for
“We can’t miss the deadline, but we also can’t tell ops their history just disappeared.”
Phuong Setiawan · Global Logistics Compliance Director
Owns transport-record retention obligations while relying on historical shipment data for investigations and carrier disputes.
What is at stake
The retention deadline is six weeks from now, and the records you sampled show mixed classification and open exceptions on access. Detail vanishes from live views for good, so decide what to verify before calling go-live.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- compliance deadline vs. operational continuity
- machine-generated evidence vs. human verification
- archive control vs. live-history usability
- customer access needs vs. data minimization
Why Project44
At Project44, this can matter when trusted visibility must coexist with customer-specific data obligations.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 6 more at Project44, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.