A mandatory integration change can make continuity depend on behavior that cannot be fully rehearsed.
Teams must preserve trusted shipment state while accepting a new delivery model under a fixed external deadline.
Who you’d be doing this for
“If this carrier goes dark, my team will be chasing status through emails all week.”
Alicia Souza · Global Freight Control Tower Lead
Oversees air and ocean shipment exceptions for a manufacturer with time-critical inbound materials.
What is at stake
The carrier retires its polling feed in 45 days, and the webhook replacement uses different auth and different event meanings. You have to prove shipment states and ETA inputs stay correct before you can test at full volume.
Why it isn’t already fixed
Every obvious fix costs something else. That’s the part you’d have to decide.
- cutover speed vs. proof of correctness
- webhook resilience vs. duplicate-state risk
- continuity demands vs. security controls
- managed shortcut vs. platform ownership
Why Project44
At Project44, carrier interface changes can have broad effects because movement data is expected to remain usable across active freight networks.
Written with these in mind
Not your kind of problem? 6 more at Project44, or browse every organization.
This is the setup. The work is inside.
Running it puts you in the room: the full situation and its constraints, stakeholders who push back in their own words, and the decisions that are yours to make. What you produce becomes a Day One Plan — work you can show someone instead of describing.